A Member Firm of Andersen Global

Blog

Bahrain has signed an agreement to implement the US Foreign Account Taxpayer Compliance Act with the United States.

FATCA, enacted by the US Congress in 2010, is intended to ensure that the US obtains information on accounts held abroad at foreign financial institutions (FFIs) by US persons. Failure by an FFI to disclose information on their US clients will result in a requirement to withhold 30 percent tax on payments of US-sourced income.

The Intergovernmental Agreement will provide for a simplified framework for Bahraini financial institutions to comply with the US FATCA, through a centralized agency, and remove any legal restrictions on the collection and exchange of the relevant information.

The EFTA states – Switzerland, Liechtenstein, Norway, and Iceland – and India recently discussed how to push for the conclusion of a bilateral free trade agreement.

The free trade negotiations started in October 2008, with 13 rounds being held until November 2013. Chief negotiators decided to resume negotiations in 2016 after taking stock of their status and held a 14th round of negotiations in October 2016.

The two parties held a 15th round of negotiations in New Delhi on January 11-13. Experts from both sides held targeted discussions on outstanding issues regarding trade in goods, trade in services, rules of origin, and intellectual property rights. They also reviewed the state of play of all other topics under discussion.

Both sides agreed to continue negotiations with a view to concluding an agreement in the near future. The next round of negotiations will be held in Geneva in spring 2017.

The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA) National Budget 2017 sees a progressively lower budget deficit with the aim of achieving break even by 2020. The government has considered taxes as one of the sources for additional revenue with the introduction of certain new/revised levies on expatriates and, most notably, the Value Added Tax (VAT). Whilst these reforms will result in additional revenue for the government, it may increase the cost of doing business in KSA.

Expatriate Levy

Currently, companies pay a levy of SAR 200 per month per expatriate employee, but only for expatriate employees that exceed the number of Saudi employees. From next year, this fee will be increased gradually (from January every year) until 2020. Furthermore, for expatriate employees not exceeding the number Saudi employees, the fee will no longer be waived but will be levied at a discounted rate.

In addition, a new fee on dependents of expatriate employees will be levied. This fee will be applicable from July 2017. The fee will be SAR 100 per dependent per month and will increase gradually every year until 2020.

The potential plans to levy income tax and or remittance tax on expatriate employees has been placed on hold for now.

Value Added Tax (VAT)

The Saudi National Budget 2017 revealed that KSA signed the GCC (member states comprising Bahrain, KSA, Kuwait, Oman, Qatar and UAE) unified framework agreement for VAT in December 2016. The Saudi National Budget 2017 also confirmed the implementation of VAT in KSA from January 2018.

The current indication is that most goods and services will be subject to VAT at 5%. Certain goods and services may be either zero rated or exempt from VAT. More details on applicability of VAT will be available once the GCC framework and KSA VAT law is published.

Excise Tax on harmful goods

Excise tax will be implemented on certain products that are viewed to be harmful to individual’s health.

Excise Tax of 50% on soft drinks (at this stage, there is no indication on whether it will apply to all or specific soft drinks), and 100% on tobacco products and energy drinks will be imposed from April 2017. This will result in these specific products becoming costlier and potentially achieving the objective of reduced consumption.

History

India and Cyprus had signed an agreement in June 1994 and were bound to exchange information to avoid tax evasions.  It is considered to be a tax haven before 2015 and stands seventh on the list of Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) destinations in India. India received foreign investments of approximately INR 42,680 from Cyprus from April 2000 to March 2016.

On 1st November, 2013 India has marked Cyprus as “Non- Cooperative Jurisdiction/ Notified Jurisdiction” under Section 94A of Income Tax Act, 1961 of India, upon its failure to disclose crucial information about money being transferred by Indian citizens and are suspects of tax evasions. Consequently, the transactions for transferring the funds from and to Cyprus reduced to avoid payment of higher withholding taxes and disclosure requirement. The authorities at Cyprus recognized the need to take effective steps in this regard and initiated change in their policies.

In October, 2015 the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) declared that Cyprus had been found to be complaint with the requirements and standards laid down by Global Forum on Transparency and exchange of information for tax purposes. Cyprus got rating equals to United States, United Kingdom and Germany. With this, Cyprus lost its status of a tax haven.

The new Treaty

Mid 2016 has been a very significant period for tax treaties of India with major tax havens. Marking a historic change, India – Mauritius tax treaty have been re-negotiated and it began a new chapter of foreign investments in India.

On 29th June, 2016 the Ministry of Finance of Cyprus issued a statement that they have completed the negotiations with India and reached at agreements on all pending issues between India and Cyprus after an official level meeting held on 28th and 29th June at New Delhi. On 1st July, 2016 the Indian Ministry of Finance issued a press release confirming the same and mentioning to provide a “Grandfathering clause” for investments made prior to 1st April, 2017 for residence based taxation of capital gains. These agreements also paved way for removal of Cyprus from notified jurisdictions with retrospective effect.

These provisional agreements later been put before the cabinet of Indian Government headed by Prime Minister of India and approved by the Cabinet in August, 2016. The approved agreements which will now replace the 1994 treaty were signed on 18th November, 2016 at Nicosia, the capital of Cyprus. Mr. Ravi Bangar, high Commissioner of India to Cyprus and Mr. Harris Georgiades, the Minister of Finance of Cyprus has signed the agreement on behalf of India and Cyprus respectively. It is expected to come into force with effect from coming financial year i.e. 1st April, 2017.

The Major Provisions

The new agreements provide for source based taxation of capital gains arising from transfer of shares rather than residence based taxation as provided under previous treaty. Accordingly, all the capital gains from transfer of shares can now be taxed in country of transaction and India shall benefit by taxing the transactions undertaken in the country by Cyprus residents.

It is important to note here that as provided by the “Grandfathering clause” in the agreement, investments made prior to 1st April, 2017 can be taxed in the country where the taxpayer is resident.

The new agreement broadens the scope of permanent establishment and rate of withholding tax on royalties is reduced from 15% to 10% to bring it in line with the tax rate under Indian Laws.

New agreement also defines the provisions related to the exchange of information between the countries as per international standards and both the countries assisting each other for collection of taxes. This new treaty also paves the way for removing Cyprus from “Notified Jurisdiction” in India with retrospective effect from November, 2013 after the treaty comes into force.

Conclusion

This is a welcome move for investor and industry in both the countries. Both the countries have enjoyed good trade relations in past decades and this step shall definitely foster the growth. Cyprus shall once again become one of the largest sources of FDI in India and other parts of the world. The government’s keenness to improve the level of transparency in investments to and from Cyprus have already started delivering results and Cyprus has become a popular destination for European investors under Alternate Investment Fund Manager Directive. If Cyprus manages to keep up with robust compliance and transparency, it shall soon be most preferred destination for investment vehicles across the world.

For more details reach us at [email protected]

  • Saint Kitts and Nevis – United Arab Emirates: DTA Signed
  • Hong Kong – Romania:  DTA Signed
  • Cyprus – India: DTA Signed
  • Germany – Australia: DTA entered into force
  • Canada – Madagascar: DTA Signed
  • Russia – Singapore: DTA entered into force

 

RIYADH: Saudi Arabia and Turkey have signed eight agreements in Istanbul in the presence of Commerce and Investment Minister Majid Al-Qassabi and Turkish Economy Minister NihadZabka to boost bilateral trade.

The signing of agreements took place during the Saudi-Turkish Joint Business Council meeting in Istanbul.

Speaking after the signing of the agreements, Zabka said that Turkey has set up an investment-friendly climate for foreigners to do businesses with a sense of security, which would protect their interests in the country. “We have removed all obstacles and facilitated smooth investment procedures in Turkey,” Zabka noted, adding that Saudi and Turkish businessmen can harness these incentives for mutual interests.

Responding to Zabka’s speech, Al-Qassabi said that such incentives are important for the two countries to forge ahead.

Mazen Rajab, head of the Saudi side of the business council, said that Saudi investments in Turkey have reached $10 billion which is a healthy growth of bilateral trade.

Saudi companies mainly invest in the industrial sector in Turkey in collaboration with the Turkish private and public sectors. They can also increase their investments in agricultural, finance, tourism and communications sectors.

Turkey, on the other hand, has had a sizable number of highly qualified and technologically superior contractors who are present today in every part of the globe, including the Arabian Gulf states.

In the field of tourism, Turkey has been doing very well. A total of 39 million tourists visited Turkey in 2013, raising revenue from tourism to reach $32 billion.

“Economic ties between the two countries are strongly backed by identical approaches on the whole range of bilateral and regional issues,” YunusDemirer, the Turkish ambassador in Riyadh, said in an earlier interview.

Trade between Turkey and Saudi Arabia has been growing consistently. Around 80 percent of Turkey’s exports to the Kingdom are industrial products, whereas agricultural products account for 10 percent of exports.

On the other hand, the bulk of Turkey’s imports from Saudi Arabia come from crude oil and petrochemical products.

A close observation of the imports shows that the share of crude oil in total imports declined from 79 percent to below 40 percent between 2000 and 2014, while the share of petrochemicals increased drastically (the value of imports of polypropylene rose to $1 billion) in the same period. On the other hand, the decrease in the last two years was mainly related to the decline in crude oil prices.

Speaking about the upswing in trade and investment, Ambassador Demirer said that there is a genuine opportunity to establish a long-term partnership between the Turkish and Saudi business communities. Saudi visitors feel at ease in Turkey, says the envoy.

“As neighbors and two of the world’s oldest civilizations, Turkey and Saudi Arabia have shared a long history of religious, cultural, scientific and economic linkages,” said the envoy, adding that Turkish imports from Saudi Arabia have been traditionally dominated by fossil fuels.

For more details reach us at [email protected]

In brief

The Customs Authorities of the Gulf Co-operation Council (GCC) countries have recently finalized the Unified GCC Customs Tariff 2017, which will enter into force on 1 January 2017. The amendments to the Unified GCC Customs Tariff may have a major impact on your company.

In detail

Every five years, the HS is updated in order to reflect the major technical and global developments, and changes in trade patterns. The HS 2012 amendments, for example, included noticeable changes on biodiesel and diapers. The majority of amendments, however, usually relate to the agricultural and food sector – which is also the case for the HS 2017. The new amendments do also include a few notable changes.

HS and Unified GCC

Customs Tariff The HS is a multipurpose international product nomenclature developed by the World Customs Organization (WCO). It comprises about 5,000 commodity groups; each identified by a six digit code.

The HS is used by more than 200 countries and economies as a basis for their Customs tariffs and for the collection of international trade statistics. Over 98% of the merchandise in international trade is classified in terms of the HS.

As members of the WCO, the GCC countries have agreed to use a common system based on the HS: the Unified GCC Customs Tariff, which sets eight digit codes to classify goods for customs purposes (the first six digits correspond to the HS).

HS 2017 notable changes

The most striking amendments in HS 2017 are to be found in the forestry, chemistry, pharmaceutical and technology sector. In the forestry sector (chapter 44) the HS codes have been amended enabling a recommended to provide clear instructions to their customs agents to comply with the new Customs Tariff.

The use of incorrect HS codes may lead businesses to declare products for entry into the GCC without the applicable import permits or certificate of conformity; furthermore it may lead to the assessment of the wrong customs duty rates, underpaying or overpaying customs duties to the GCC Customs Authorities.

For more details reach us at [email protected]

New information on Country-by-Country reporting should give more certainty to tax administrations and multinationals on how to implement it.

On 5 December 2016, the OECD released further guidance on Country-by-Country (CbC) reporting and country-specific information on implementation of the guidance. CbC reporting is linked to action point 13 in the Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (BEPS) initiative.

Background on BEPS

Base erosion and profit shifting are tax avoidance strategies mostly used to exploit loopholes within the tax/legal environment by shifting profits from one specific country to a country with low or no tax, where, in most cases, the company has no or little economic activity.

Currently over 100 countries and jurisdictions have, or will, implement regulations to address base erosion and profit shifting as part of the OECD’s initiative to counter fight these practises. Both the OECD and the participating countries issued a report in 2015 containing the so called 15 action points to be taken into consideration and implementation by countries when dealing with BEPS.

The main focus of these action points is to identify and neutralise gaps and mismatches in tax rules across the countries, and facilitate increased exchange of tax information between jurisdictions to improve tax compliance.

New rules and regulations along the way

The implementation of BEPS-related laws and regulations is a rolling process, as each country is implementing BEPS action points with different views, interpretations and timelines. The OECD is continuously providing additional guidance on how these action points should be interpreted and suggesting best ways for them to be implemented.

As part of such, on 5 December 2016 the OECD released further guidance on CbC reporting and country-specific information on implementation of the guidance, specifically:

  • Key details of jurisdictions’ legal framework for CbC reporting
  • Additional interpretive guidance on the CbC reporting standard.

In short, the new information on country-specific reporting should give more certainty to tax administrations and multinationals on how to implement CbC reporting. It affects the timeline when CbC reporting has to be done, whether surrogate filing and voluntary filing is available for specific countries and if local CbC filing is required. Furthermore it contains information on the implementation of international exchange of CbC reports between country tax administrations.

The guidance tackles the case where notification to the country tax administration involves identifying the reporting entity within the multinationals’ structure, and how, once identified that such a notification is required it’s up to the jurisdictions to set a due date for acting upon it, thus providing some flexibility. This will be relevant while jurisdictions transit through the finalisation of their local implementation of CbC reporting and multinationals adapt to the new norms.

For more details reach us at [email protected]

Introduction

United Arab Emirates is always known for fast pace development and adapting the things to promote investor and form an attractive business environment. The government of Abu Dhabi has announced establishment of Abu Dhabi Global Market (ADGM) in 2013 to partner in regional and international growth of UAE. ADGM will comprise of three authorities namely, ADGM Courts, Registration Authority and Financial Services Regulatory Authority (FSRA). ADGM is set up in Maryah Island in the Capital of UAE.

ADMG Courts shall be supporting ADMG in adjudicating civil and common law matters. The ADGM Courts Regulations and Rules were enacted by ADGM’s Board of Directors and the Chief Justice on 17th December, 2015. They have recently started their operations and do not have jurisdiction in Criminal Courts. UAE have become the first nation in region to adopt this system.

Structure

ADGM Courts have a court at first instance and after that a court of appeal. The courts contain three divisions, namely Civil, Small Claims and employment. The judges at these courts are highly experienced and are drawn from all parts of the world. They are mandatorily required to have strong standards of judicial independence and acts on an impartial basis.

Jurisdiction

These courts are formed to facilitate the judicial proceedings for the companies operating under ADGM. The courts at first instance shall have jurisdiction over all the commercial cases and disputes related to ADMG or any of its authority and the companies operating under ADMG. These courts shall also have jurisdiction over any disputes arising out of transaction or contact formed whole or in part at ADMG. An appeal against the decision of ADGM authorities can also be filed here. These courts have three divisions, viz. civil division, small claims division and employment division.

Civil division shall have jurisdiction over cases where the value of claims are more than USD 100,000 and are not related to employment or family matters.

Small Claims division shall have jurisdiction over cases where the value of claims are less than USD 100,000 and are not related to family matters.

Employment division shall have jurisdiction over disputes arising out of employment contracts and enforcing the provisions related to employment regulations

Audience

Any person may appear as audience before small division courts or courts at first instance. However, he is required to follow the code of conduct for appearance in the court. Unlike, in other courts in the region ADGM courts have not prescribed any legal qualification or experience for audience.

The Future

Online facility is expected to be operational soon and it will allow parties to file e-complaints, document and have e-trials. This is surely an initiative for future and will attract the investor to come and invest as he will have the facility of address disputes as they are dealt with in English Law.

For more details reach us at [email protected]

A five per cent VAT will lead to fundamental change in the way businesses operate across around the region.

The adoption of value added tax by GCC countries in 2018 would enable the six countries to generate additional annual revenues of $25 billion, tax experts.

A five per cent VAT, which represents a major shift in tax policy that will impact all segments of the economy, will lead to a fundamental change in the way businesses operate across around the region.

In the UAE, VAT is expected to generate around Dh10 billion to Dh12 billion in additional revenues in the first year of implementation, or about 1.5-2 per cent of GDP. Companies that record annual revenues over Dh3.75 million will be obliged to register under the VAT system, while companies whose revenues range between Dh1.87 million and Dh3.75 million will have an option to either register under the system or not during the first phase of rolling out the system.

VAT will bring more people in the tax bracket in the UAE economy. It would increase tax to GDP Ratio and help the government in economic and structural reforms moving forward, experts said.

The additional $25 billion revenue will allow GCC governments to amend the tax policy and other fees and charges and increase infrastructure investments.

As businesses prepare to implement VAT across numerous sectors, they will need to invest in analyzing, redesigning, developing and implementing updated systems, processes, contracts and business arrangements to match the requirements of the new tax system.

All GCC countries are working towards VAT implementation by 1 January 2018 to avoid transaction and sales issues that could arise from intra-GCC trade.

For more details reach us at [email protected]

Follow Us

Recent Posts