Blog

On 23 June 2016, the people of the United Kingdom (UK) voted to exit the European Union (EU). The narrow margin of victory for Brexit and the strong reactions across the political and social spectrum were unexpected. This leaves the way forward unclear, especially for businesses.

There is uncertainty on the exact tax and other consequences of the withdrawal of UK from the EU, although it is expected that it will take about two years to settle down.

Tax impact of Brexit

The tax impact of an exit by the UK from the EU would depend on a number of factors, including the nature of the UK’s future relationship with the EU, which will only be clear in time. The UK is likely to follow one of the following models for its negotiations.

Type of negotiation models

Currently, it is difficult to determine the impact of Brexit, but it may be possible to obtain an idea on how the UK and the EU will operate after the Brexit. There are various models, like the Swiss model and the Norwegian model, which deal with the UK will handle post-Brexit operations with its EU neighbors.

  • Swiss Model (Bilateral Arrangement Model)
    • Switzerland is not a part of the EU or the European Economic Area (EEA). However, there are a series of bilateral treaties between Switzerland and the EU. These treaties enable Switzerland to participate in specific EU policies or programmes. For example, insurance, pensions and fraud prevention treaties.
    • Post-Brexit, the UK may enter into a standalone free trade agreement with the EU or a series of agreements to cover individual trade sectors. The drawback of the Swiss model would be that it will not give UK the same market access which it would have as a member of the EU or EEA.
  • Norwegian Model (EEA Model)
    • The European Economic Area (EEA) comprises of all members of the EU together with three non-EU countries – Norway, Iceland and Liechtenstein. Members of the EEA are a part of the European Single Market. There is a free movement of goods, services, people and capital within the EEA. Membership fees are charged to the EEA to be a part of the single market.
    • Post Brexit, the UK may join the European Economic Area by paying membership fees on the same basis as these other countries. Therefore, there is a possibility that the UK will retain access to the common market. The drawback of the Norwegian model is that the UK would have to pay membership fees.

There has been a lot of discussion on the changes for tax and compliance after Brexit, but it is not clear at the moment as it depends on the nature of the UK’s future relationship with the EU. However, we can explore some of the changes that could be of use as far as tax and compliance are concerned. Listed below are the tax areas, which will be affected by the Brexit.

Impact on Customs Duty

  • The first impact of Brexit would fall on customs duties. The EU is a customs union as well as a single market i.e. the customs duty is regulated by EU Directives and Regulations and the duty rates are also set at the EU level. As a customs union, there are no customs duties within the EU’s territory and EU member states share common external tariffs with third countries. Collected imports duty into the UK is transmitted to the EU.
  • Post Brexit, the UK would cease to be a part of the customs union and therefore cannot enjoy the relaxation provided by the EU customs union.
  • Around 50% of UK’s exports are to the EU and only 10% of exports from the EU are to the UK. It is expected that the UK would enact new rules and regulations to regulate customs duty which is currently regulated through EU Directives, Regulations and Council Decisions. If so, exports between the UK and the EU would need to go through customs procedures like any other non-EU country. However, tariffs are regulated internationally by the World Customs Organisation and pursuant to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade. Thus, the UK must also abide by these regulations.
  • The impact of a Brexit on customs duty would purely depend upon on the UK’s post-Brexit approach to customs duty. It is expected that the UK would enter into some form of customs agreement with the EU.

 

Impact on Value Added Tax

  • Presently in the UK, VAT is levied on supplies made within the UK, intra-community transactions with other EU member states and imports. UK VAT law was required to incorporate EU directives which ensured supplies made within EU members would be treated differently or beneficially and would not be considered at par with sales made to non-member states.
  • Post Brexit, EU directives will no longer be applicable and other member states will be treated as a separate country for VAT purposes. It will trigger import/export provisions; in simple words, VAT will be charged according to the provisions of supplies between the UK and non-EU member states and intra-community VAT charging provisions will be replaced. It may increase the procedural compliances and ultimately the cost of compliances. Predictably, there may not be a significant financial net impact on VAT on account of the Brexit.    
  • It is predicted that the UK may extend the zero rate list as the EU Directives will not be applicable. The UK will loose all the benefits of EU member states except which those which are generally applicable to non-member states such as ’The Mini One Stop Shop (MOSS)’ non-union scheme, for the supply of digital services to the consumers in EU.
  • The above impacts are considered based on the current UK VAT law. The exact tax implications of the Brexit will be determined only after the actual negotiation takes place between the UK and the EU to determine the exit terms.


Impact on Corporate Income Tax

  • Currently, there is no single corporate tax system in the EU as it is applicable for VAT. There exists a Parent-Subsidiary Directive between EU countries to prevent double taxation. This prohibits the levying of taxes (including withholding tax) on intra-group dividend, interest and royalty receipts and payments.
  • The EU Mergers Directive simplifies the reorganisation of groups based in more than one EU member state. Mergers result in the transfer of assets and liabilities between one or more receiving companies. The Directive provides for the deferral of taxes that could be charged on the difference between the market value of the asset and the tax value during mergers of companies situated in the EU member states.
  • For the EU, the Brexit may fast track the introduction of Common Consolidated Corporate Tax Base (CCCTB – a single set of regulations that companies operating within the EU could use to calculate their taxable profits) as the UK had been a major opponent to the introduction of CCCTB.
  • As for Parent Subsidiary Directives, Post-Brexit, these directives would not apply in the UK. A UK-based company with subsidiaries in EU member states would need to rely on the UK’s arrangements of double tax treaties with each member state to prevent double-taxation on intra-group dividends, interest payments and royalties.
  • Post Brexit, UK’s domestic tax rules would apply instead of the EU Mergers Directives which may lead to levy of ’exit charges’* on the transfer of assets and liabilities between UK and EU companies within the same group.
  • If the UK joins EEA (i.e. if the UK negotiates any kind of agreement for free movement of people, goods, services, capital, etc.) there will be no major impact. Assuming the UK will not join EEA, they may amend their tax laws to revert to its former position.

 *Exit charges are the charges triggered in the home jurisdiction in effect of the change in tax residence of an individual or on the transfer of taxable assets between the corporate from home jurisdiction to another jurisdiction.


Impact on Withholding Tax on Interest, Dividend and Royalty

  • Many harmonising directives have been implemented by the EU to support the freedom of establishment. The most important directives are the Parent-Subsidiary Directive and the Interest and Royalty Directive.
  • The Parent-Subsidiary Directive abolishes withholding tax on dividends paid between associated companies within the EU. The Interest and Royalties Directive prohibits withholding taxes on intra-group interest and royalty payments made within the EU.
  • Post Brexit, the above directives would not be applicable to the UK. It could have the following impact:
    • For groups with a UK parent and EU subsidiaries or EU parent and UK subsidiaries, double taxation of dividends may arise.
    • Withholding tax cost could arise due to payment of interest and royalties into the EU from the UK or to the UK from EU subject to the applicable double tax treaties.


Impact on Social Security and Pension

  • The EU social security regulations apply to EU nationals moving to another EU country to perform work. As per the regulations, if an EU national is paying social security and health insurance in the home country, he may be exempted from paying these contributions in the other EU country where he has been posted. The insured EU national must provide the A1 and S1 forms, where applicable, to prove he is insured in the home country.
  • This would mean that UK employees who work in another member country would be eligible for exemption in that country if they are paying social security contributions in the UK. Similarly, EU nationals of another member country posted to work in the UK, can also apply for exemption from paying NIC contributions in the UK by providing form A1.
  • Currently, UK pensioners living in the EU have their state pensions protected as they are upgraded annually in relation to the wage price index. Therefore, the state pension would increase every year for retirees living in the EU member state or the EEA. If the pensioner lives outside these countries, the pension is frozen at the rate at which the individual left the UK.
  • Post-Brexit, the UK would no longer be a part of the EU social security system. This means that EU nationals working in the UK would no longer be eligible for exemption and may have to pay the social security contribution in the UK and in that EU member state. Alternatively, UK may sign a bilateral agreement with the EU, which for example Switzerland has, according to which it is treated as an EU member with respect to social security. In addition, UK may enter into social security agreements with individual EU countries to claim this exemption.
  • In relation to pensioners, the UK government will have to decide the state pension treatment for UK retirees living in other EU member states. Such retirees could be treated as if they were to retire in any non-EU country, where their pension is frozen at the time of leaving the UK. Presumably, UK could also enter into a renegotiation process with the EU member countries where state pensions could be marked against the wage price inflation and not be frozen.
  • As long as the UK remains a part of the EU, UK nationals working across EU have their pension and health care protected. After the exit, these advantages would be up for negotiation, possibly on a country-by-country basis.


Impact on Immigration

  • Currently, the principle of free movement of people among EU member states exists. A national of one EU country has the right to live and work in any other member state of the EU. About 1.2 million Brits live in other EU countries and about 3 million non-British EU citizens are live in the UK. They were allowed to move freely within the EU with minimal paperwork because of the EU rules.
  • Britain’s exit from the EU may change this free movement. The impact of Brexit on migration will depend on the kind of relationship that the UK would establish post-Brexit.
    • One of the possibilities is that the UK could negotiate a new treaty with the EU that continues to allow free movement between the UK and the EU. Like Norway and Switzerland, UK may implement free movement as part of their economic cooperation agreements with the EU. This will limit the impact of Britain’s exit on immigration.
    • Another possibility is that the EU withdrawal may result in the end of free movement and the introduction of entry formalities for EU nationals who want to work in the UK. This would mean that people moving to or from the UK would be subject to the same visa rules that apply to non-EU nationals moving to an EU member country. This will have a profound impact on migration and it would be difficult for EU citizens to live and work in the UK.

Impact on Data Protection

  • The current EU data protection regime is based on the Data Protection Directive. In the United Kingdom, the EU Data Protection Directive is implemented through the Data Protection Act 1998. The European Union will be introducing General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) which will be effective from May 2018.
  • The Information Commissioner (Chief of Data Protection Act in the UK) has stated that UK businesses will continue to prepare for GDPR noting that data protection laws will remain relevant.
  • Post-Brexit, if the UK chooses to leave the EU but remains part of European Economic Area (EEA) then nothing would change for the UK and it would still have to comply with the EU Data Protective Directive and upcoming General Data Protection Regulation. However, if the UK chooses to leave the EU without joining the EFTA (European Free Trade Association), then the country would be free to revise its data protection framework and deviate from EU standards and the upcoming GDPR would not apply to the UK.

In such situations, the UK Data Protection Act will need to be amended to prove that the UK is a ’safe third country’. If it fails to prove this, then data transfer to the UK would be subject to strict regulations.

For more details reach us at [email protected]

To boost the employment and job creation in India, the government, in a meeting chaired by Prime Minister Narendra Modi on 20 June 2016, further liberalised the foreign direct investment (FDI) regime. These changes come as a part of the second round of reformative steps following the initial announcement in November 2015. Now, most sectors would fall under the automatic approval route, except for a small negative list.

As per the announcement, changes introduced in the policy include increasing sectoral caps, bringing more activities under the automatic route and easing of conditionalities for foreign investment. These amendments seek to further simplify the regulations governing FDI in the country and make India an attractive destination for foreign investors. Details of these changes are given below.
100%

100% FDI in brownfield projects is allowed under the automatic route.

FDI up to 49% is allowed under the automatic route and beyond 49%, under the government approval route.

Sector

Changes in FDI norms

Sectoral Cap

Liberalisation

Food industry

FDI under the government approval route for trading, including through e-commerce, with respect to food products manufactured or produced in India, is permitted

100%

FDI allowed in the sector.

Defence sector

FDI permitted under:

  • Automatic Route – 49%
  • Government approval route – Beyond 49%

100%

FDI beyond 49% is allowed under the government approval route for cases resulting in the access to modern technology in the country or for the reason to be recorded.

The condition of access to ‘state-of-art’ technology has been done away with.

Pharmaceutical

Brownfield

  • Automatic route – 74%
  • Government approval route – Beyond 74%

100%

FDI up to 74% in brownfield projects is allowed under the automatic route.

Broadcasting carriage services

New entry routes/sectors introduced:

    1. Teleports (setting up of up-linking HUBs/teleports);

    2. Direct to Home (DTH);

    3. Cable networks (Multi System Operators (MSOs) operating at a national or state or district level and undertaking upgradation of networks towards digitisation and addressability);

    4. Mobile TV;

    5. Headend-in-the-Sky broadcasting services (HITS)

    6. Cable networks Infusion of fresh foreign investment, beyond 49% in a company not seeking license/permission from a sectoral ministry, resulting in a change in the ownership pattern or transfer of stake by existing investors to new foreign investors, will require FIPB approval.

100%

The entry route for the sector has been reviewed and new sectoral caps have been prescribed.

Civil aviation sector

Brownfield

  • Automatic route- 100%

 

 

Scheduled Air Transport Service/Domestic Scheduled Passenger Airline and regional Air Transport Service

  • Automatic route – 49%

  • Government approval route – Beyond 49%

 

100%

 

100%

100% FDI in brownfield projects is allowed under the automatic route.

FDI up to 49% is allowed under the automatic route and beyond 49%, under the government approval route.

Private security agencies

FDI permitted under:

  • Automatic route – 49%

  • Government approval route – 49% to 74%

74%

FDI up to 49% is allowed under the automatic route and beyond 49% but up to 74% is permitted under the government approval route.

Animal husbandry

FDI in animal husbandry (including breeding of dogs), pisciculture, aquaculture and apiculture is permitted under the automatic route.

100%

It has been decided to do away with the requirement of ‘controlled conditions’ for FDI in these activities.

Other changes in the FDI Policy

Establishment of branch office, liaison office or project office

If the principal business of the applicant is defence, telecom, private security or information/broadcasting and it proposes to establish a branch office, liaison office, project office or any other place of business in India, there is no need for RBI approval or separate security clearances (where FIPB approval or license/permission by the concerned Ministry/Regulator has already been granted).

Single brand retail trading
Approval for the proposed relaxed local sourcing norms up to three years and a relaxed sourcing regime for another five years for entities undertaking single brand retail trading of products having ‘state-of-art’ and ‘cutting-edge’ technology.

The aforesaid changes introduced in the FDI Policy will take effect as per due process.

For more details reach us at [email protected]

South Korea and India have agreed to enter into talks aimed at re-negotiating the terms of their existing bilateral Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement (CEPA), particularly to improve the list of traded goods subject to reduced tariffs.

In a statement following the second meeting of the Joint Ministerial Committee held to review the CEPA in New Delhi on June 18, the South Korean Ministry of Trade, Industry, and Energy confirmed that the percentage of tariffs eliminated or reduced in the current agreement (which entered into force on January 1, 2010) is less than in the free trade agreements subsequently concluded by South Korea with other jurisdictions.

The Ministry confirmed that, presently, only about 85 percent of South Korean exports to India (both in terms of the number of items and their value) are tariff free or pay a reduced rate of import duty. With regard to Indian goods exported to South Korea, only 93 percent by number of items (or 90 percent by value) are subject to tariff elimination or reduction.

The Indian Government has become concerned at the increasing trade deficit being seen recently by India in its trade with South Korea. In reply, during the meeting, the South Korean Minister of Trade, Industry, and Energy, Joo Hyunghwan, stressed that his country is open to increasing trade with India and to allowing Indian exporters greater market access on a reciprocal basis.

India’s Commerce Minister Nirmala Sitharaman looked for greater market access in South Korea for the Indian agricultural, marine, information technology and service sectors. On the other hand, South Korean exporters might expect to see improved terms for its steel, electrical and electronic, and automotive parts industries, within a CEPA renegotiation.

For more details reach us at [email protected]

RIYADH: Saudi Arabia has completed the process for endorsing the WTO Trade Facilitation Agreement.

The Kingdom is the second country to endorse the treaty, according to the Ministry of Commerce and Investment, local media reported on 15.06.2016.

Minister of Commerce and Investment Majed Al-Qassabi said on 14.06.2016 that the agreement is one of the most important trade accords with the WTO.

The agreement seeks to ease the procedures and documentation demands that are required by authorities and government parties concerned with exporting and importing to bring them in line with world standards without compromising government-established monitoring systems.

This will include the removal of obstacles to commercial movements across borders.

He said that this will benefit small and medium-size enterprises that Saudi Arabia is very keen to promote in light of Vision 2030, adding that this will also increase transparency in the market.

Ahmad Al-Haqabani, foreign trade undersecretary of the ministry, said that studies by the WTO and World Bank support the application of this agreement and state that the new measures will reduce the cost of international trade by one percent.

For more details reach us at [email protected]

The Financial and Economic Cooperation Committee in the Gulf Cooperation Council will hold an extraordinary meeting in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, 24.05.2016 to discuss the introduction of taxes.

The official Saudi Press Agency (SPA) reported that the meeting will discuss a number of topics, including the recommendations regarding the draft of a unified agreement on value added tax (VAT) and selective taxes in GCC member states.

It is expected that the Gulf states will introduce VAT of five per cent to by 2018 to combat the reduction in revenue due to the drop in oil prices. This will be the first time such a tax will be introduced in the region.

Last November, GCC states agreed to impose a selective tax on tobacco.

The Gulf Cooperation Council consists of six countries: Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, Qatar, Kuwait, Bahrain and Oman.

For more details reach us at [email protected]

New Delhi: India announced on 20.06.2016, sweeping reforms to rules on foreign direct investment, opening up its defence and civil aviation sectors to complete outside ownership and clearing the way for Apple to open stores in the country.

The move comes two days after central bank governor Raghuram Rajan, a darling of financial markets but under pressure from political opponents at home, announced he would not seek another term, a surprise move that raised concerns about whether reforms he set in motion will stall.

Prime Minister Narendra Modi hailed the changes to the foreign direct investment (FDI) rules, stressing his government’s reform credentials. He tweeted that the changes would make India “the most open economy in the world for FDI” and provide a “major impetus to employment and job creation”.

“These changes are fairly significant, particularly if you look at them in the context of what happened over the weekend with Governor Rajan’s decision to step down,” said Shilan Shah, India economist at Capital Economics in Singapore.

“It might be the government’s way to illustrate its commitment to reforms and mitigate any investor fallout following Rajan’s decision.”

The last time Modi’s government announced a loosening of FDI norms was after his nationalist political party suffered a heavy defeat in a state election last autumn.

The new reform measures also relax restrictions on inbound investments in pharmaceuticals and single-brand retail.

Apple is expected to be a beneficiary of a three-year relaxation India is introducing on local sourcing norms with an extension of up to five years possible if it can be proven that products are “state of the art”.

“We will inform Apple to indicate whether they would like to avail new provisions,” Rajesh Abhishek, secretary of the Department of Industrial Policy and Promotion, told a news conference.

Other single-brand retailers like furniture giant IKEA also stand to benefit.

Defence contractors that have been reluctant to transfer technology to manufacture equipment in India would get the right to own local operations outright, with government approval, up from a cap of 49 per cent previously.

In other changes, India allowed 100 per cent FDI in civil aviation, following on launch of a new policy that lowered barriers to entry for airlines that want to fly international routes.

The government also allowed foreign companies to own up to 74 per cent in ‘brownfield’ pharmaceuticals projects without prior government approval. India already allows 100 per cent ownership of greenfield pharma businesses.

For more details reach us at [email protected]

India and Maldives signed two new tax agreements on April 11, 2015, for the exchange of information in tax matters and for the avoidance of double taxation of income from international air transport.

The tax information exchange agreement is based on international standards on transparency and exchange of information. The Indian Government said it covers taxes of every kind and description imposed by both territories, and enables the exchange of information, including banking information.

The second Agreement provides for relief from double taxation for the airlines of India and Maldives by way of an exemption for income from the operation of aircraft in international traffic. Under the deal, profits from the operation of aircraft in international traffic will be taxed in one country alone; the taxing right will be conferred upon the country to which the enterprise belongs. The agreement includes Mutual Agreement Procedure provisions, to help resolve any disputes surrounding the agreement’s application.

Chile and Uruguay concluded a second round of negotiations towards a free trade agreement (FTA) on April 12, 2016, according to a statement from Chile’s Directorate General of International Relations (DIRECON).

Experts from both countries discussed various issues related to the proposed agreement, including access to goods, rules of origin, trade in services, technical barriers to trade, and trade facilitation.

The two countries are already part of the Economic Complementation Agreement between Chile and Mercosur (ACE 35), which entered into force on October 1, 1996. The agreement also includes Argentina, Brazil, and Paraguay.

Trade between Chile and Uruguay during 2015 totaled USD349m, according to DIRECON. Chilean exports to Uruguay in that period reached USD149m, while imports totaled USD200m.

For more details reach us at [email protected]

Dubai Customs announced the introduction of the Authorised Economic Operator (AEO) programme in September 2015 in line with Dubai Customs’ vision to be the leading customs administration in the world supporting legitimate trade. The AEO is one of the pillars of the WCO SAFE Framework of Standards to Secure and Facilitate Global Trade (SAFE Framework), aimed at enhancing the security in the international supply chain while facilitating global trade.

An effective AEO programme requires a true partnership between the customs administration and all agents in the international supply chain. The rationale of the AEO programme lies in the voluntary compliance with the applicable customs rules and regulations, and WCO supply chain security standards, in return for being granted a number of advantages and incentives.

Given the lack of room for manoeuvre amid the global economic slowdown, Chancellor of the Exchequer George Osborne’s latest UK budget contained a surprising number of tax measures.

Business tax roadmap

    • Corporate income tax and losses

 

Alongside the budget, the UK government has published a business tax roadmap. This sets out cuts in business rates (an annual commercial property tax), cuts in the rate of corporate income tax from 20% to 17% by 2020, and cuts in the petroleum revenue tax paid by oil and gas companies.

The roadmap also reforms the relief for corporate income losses. Companies will, in future, be able to carry forward such losses against all types of income, and surrender them for use by other companies in the same group. However, if profits exceed £5 million (presumably group not company profits), only 50% of profits can be offset by losses. These two measures should take effect from 1 April 2017, but a restriction on banks only being able to offset 25% of profits against pre-April 2015 losses will be introduced one year earlier.

    • Stamp duty land tax

 

Also included in the business tax roadmap are changes to the system of stamp duty land tax (SDLT), which businesses pay when they acquire commercial properties.  The changes follow the principles adopted by the Chancellor last year for residential property, and will take effect for transactions entered into after 17 March 2016.

Prior to the budget, purchasers paid nothing if the property cost under £150,000, 1% of the total value if it cost between £150,000 and £250,000, 3% if it cost between £250,000 and £500,000 and 4% if it cost more than that. Now purchasers will pay 0% on the first £150,000, 2% on the next £100,000 and 5% on the balance. So, for a business premises costing £200,000, the SDLT will now be £1,000 ((£200,000-£150,000) x 2%) rather than £2,000 (1% of £200,000).

    • Interest deductions on taxable profits

 

The business tax roadmap also includes restrictions on the amount of interest that can be deducted from taxable profits. From 1 January 2017 this will be set at 30% of EBITDA (earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortisation) for groups of companies with interest deductions over £2m. There will be a group ratio rule based on net interest to EBITDA for worldwide groups, and the existing worldwide debt cap will be abolished.

There are other anti-avoidance measures in the business tax roadmap, including increasing the chances of a withholding tax applying to royalty payments, and measures to tax offshore property developers on their UK developments. Businesses have been asking for another roadmap and therefore should welcome this document; however the general theme is one of relief for small businesses that is to be paid for by larger enterprises.

Personal tax

From a personal tax perspective, the Chancellor announced the abolition of Class 2 national insurance contributions (currently £2.80 per week for the self-employed) with effect from 6 April 2018. He also announced that individuals will be able to earn £1,000 from trading and £1,000 from renting property without paying income tax. Those with incomes in excess of these sums can either return income less expenses or income less the £1,000 allowance. These allowances take effect from 6 April 2017 and are welcome simplification measures.

Mr Osborne also announced a personal allowance increase for the year ending 5 April 2018. The amount of income that can be earned before any tax is paid will rise to £11,500, and the amount of income on which basic rate tax (broadly 20%) is paid, will increase to £33,500.

    • Individual savings accounts

 

The annual amount that can be saved into an Individual Savings Account (ISA), in which income and gains are tax-free, will increase to £20,000 from 6 April 2017. Few working basic-rate taxpayers can afford to save £20,000 a year, so this is of benefit to higher earners, and to those with pre-existing savings who can move funds from their taxed accounts into ISAs. The Chancellor is also planning to introduce a Lifetime ISA. This will allow persons between 18 and 40 years of age to save up to £4,000 per annum, and the government will top up the fund by £1 for every £4 saved. This measure will be subject to consultation.

Capital gains tax

The Chancellor also announced reductions in the rates of capital gains tax (CGT) from 28% to 18% for higher rate taxpayers and trusts and from 18% to 10% for basic rate taxpayers, although in practice extremely few basic rate taxpayers pay CGT. These changes take effect from 6 April 2016 and may reduce share trading volumes between now and then. The old rates continue to apply to gains on let residential property and second homes, and to “carried interest” for private equity managers. With the previously announced increases in dividend tax rates (to over 38% for the wealthiest taxpayers) taking effect at the same time, investors are likely to be looking for capital returns in future rather than yield, whilst holding their high-yielding investments in the increasingly generous ISAs.

From a stand-alone tax perspective, this was a good budget for savers, and investment managers will now focus on rebalancing their clients’ portfolios.

Follow Us

Recent Posts
WhatsApp Icon
IMC Logo IMC Group
WhatsApp Icon Start Chat