A Member Firm of Andersen Global

Blog

More than Half of MENA Executives have AI or Automation on their Top Priority

A recent study shows that about 53% of senior staff or executives who are based in the MENA region have artificial intelligence (AI) or Robotic Process Automation (RPA) on their mind when it comes to top technologies. Especially in the consumer sectors, the top technology focus in MENA is on automation.

The study says that the government services and the retail and financial services are the three main customer-facing areas, which are using AI and the efficiencies by automation drives, thus utilizing the resultant capacity to add new value, enhance the customer experience, and also enable more innovation in the products and services.

Governments are making way for the private sector

GCC Governments have instructed their departments to use more intelligent automation to further bring efficiency and encourage innovations, thereby enhancing the satisfaction levels of the residents and tourists by giving them quick and efficient public services. Dubai now stands as the most advanced city in the GCC, regarding automation of public services delivery.

This not only enhances the customer experience but also gives cost-cutting advantage due to automation. Governments should aim at creating in-house developed data science talent to increase service effectiveness and also promote innovations in the private sector.

Aiming to make the customer interactions smarter in the retail side

If used in the retail sector, RPA can build and strengthen the foundation for better digital customer experience; however, to make the customer interactions much smarter requires better predictive analytics which influence AI.

Financial services are leading the implementation of intelligent automation

The financial services sector is the most advanced when it comes to the application and usage of intelligent automation technologies. Many banks are using up-to-date storage of data to give wing-to-wing services to their customers while giving flawless connectivity between the channels, and partnerships with other service providers to facilitate fast payments and loan processing.

The extent to which intelligent automation is implemented currently could vary between and within various sectors, but the speed of transformation in this region has increased to a large extent this year as various organizations are aiming to find newer technologies and also collaborations, which could assist them in addressing the changes in their customer behavior.

Risks associated with digital transformations

As various organizations adopt fast-growing and emerging predictive technologies, they also need to evaluate and tackle information security, data privacy, and ethics.

Companies, be it public or private sector, will have to build their new models of data governance and create ethical guidelines regarding how the customer data is utilized to deal with reputational risk.

India: Buyouts Top the Investments in August this Year with More than Double of What was Received in August Last Year

Data shows that there were investments worth US$1.6 billion in August 2018 across 50 deals, in which the buyout deals recorded a little over a double jump in the value as compared to August last year. Year-to-date, PE/VC investments done till August 2018, has shot up to US$18.7 billion, which is about 9% more when compared to the same month in 2017. August 2018 had US$830 million across 18 exits with over two US$200 million deals. While exits in 2018 (counted between January to August 2018) were at US$6.7 billion, with just the Walmart-Flipkart deal of US$16 billion, exits in this year are predicted to shoot up to two times of the total value of exits recorded in last year.

Investments

In August 2018, the deal value stood at US$1.6 billion, which was at par with the investments that were recorded one month earlier; however, it was almost a 71% decrease as compared to August 2017. The huge difference here is because of the two mega deals in August 2017 – first one of Softbank’s US$2.5 billion investment in Flipkart and the second one of GIC’s US$1.4 billion investment in DLF Cyber City. When we talk of deal volume, the investment activity in August 2018 was almost equal to the deals recorded in August 2017.

In August this year, there were four deals which valued more than US$100 million (and were cumulatively totaling up to US$1.1 billion), and accounted for almost 72% of the entire investments as against US$4.7 billion, which was recorded across six deals around the same time last year, which included a couple of the biggest PE deals (mentioned above) that happened in the Indian Market. The biggest deal in August 2018 was KKR’s buyout of 60% stake worth US$530 million in Ramky Enviro Engineers Limited.

When talking about the investment stages, buyouts topped the charts in terms of investment value, with four deals worth US$683 million, which is over two times the investments received in August last year. Expansion or growth deals, which mostly lead the way when it comes to investment value, totaled up to US$467 million in investments as compared to US$4.5 billion in August 2017. Start-ups were at the top when we talk about the number of deals (29 deals).

Power and utilities were at the top from a sector point-of-view, with US$532 million investments recorded just by two deals. The next in line was real estate which had US$360 million invested in two deals. Financial services recorded about US$42 million of investments with six deals. When talking about the number of deals, Technology was at the top with seven deals.

Exits

In August 2018, 18 exits were recorded with US$830 million, which was twice the value when compared to July 2018. But when compared to August 2017, exits have gone down by about 61% in terms of value, majorly because of some large exits that were recorded in August 2017 such as Tiger Global’s exit from Flipkart, which was worth US$800 million, IFC’s exit from Tikona Digital which was worth US$246 million and Bain Capital and GIC’s part exit from Genpact worth US$294 million.

The biggest exit in August this year valued at US$225 million, which was a part exit from Ola –a cab aggregator, by Helion Ventures, Accel India, Bessemer and others when a secondary sale was done to Temasek. Another huge exit in August 2018 was when Warburg Pincus sold 8.3% stake in AU Small Finance Bank Limited for a value of US$223 million in the open market. Then the lucrative conclusion of the US$16 billion Walmart-Flipkart deal, which happened in early September will be topping the lists of exits so far in the Indian PE/VC industry and also overshadow the dollar value of the exits that happened last year.

Open market exits were at the top with deals around US$480 million across eight exits, which was followed by three secondary exits which were valued at US$248 million. A PE backed IPO that came out in August 2018, saw Micro Ventures give up its stake in the Credit Access Grameen Limited for a value of US$71 million.

Financial services led from a sector perspective, as it recorded six deals worth US$381 million.

Fund raise

In July 2018, there were nine fund raises which were worth US$2 billion. In addition, fund raise plan was announced for about US$3 billion in August 2018. The hugest fund raise totaling US$695 million was done by Sequoia with an aim on investments during the early and growth stage especially in the sectors such as technology, healthcare, and consumer sectors.

AI and similar technologies are set to create about 90 million additional jobs in China rather than displace in the coming two decades

The analysts say that AI and similar technologies like robots, drones and other autonomous vehicles will increase opportunities of employment in China by 12% in over the next 20 years, which would be approximately 90 million new job openings.

These technologies are set to not only boost China’s fiscal growth but also generate millions of new job opportunities, more than offsetting displacement of the current jobs. Though these new technologies could actually displace approximately 20% of the present UK jobs by 2037, but would also create an equally big number of new jobs by pumping economic growth.

As compared to the UK estimates, China is predicted to experience a bigger chunk of job displacement (26% vs. 20%) because of the more scope for automation in the manufacturing and agriculture sectors in China. But this is, in fact, more than offset by the huge anticipated boost to GDP in China by using AI and related technologies, which will eventually result into a much larger extent of job creation in the country (38%) as compared to the UK (20%).

The studies also noted that a lot of sectors will be benefiting from using AI and robotics and the major one will be healthcare. It is also important to understand that most of the additional jobs that will be created would have no direct link to AI or robots, but would be a resultant of a more affluent society, which in turn creates more demand of goods and services in general.

This also proves bigger opportunities for business in terms of investments in AI and similar technologies in China, which cover all domains of operations like marketing and product personalization, productive efficiency, R&D, human resource functions and also cybersecurity. However, there is a warning that a big disruption is likely to happen to all the present business models in every sector of the economy, as it is already noticed in media and entertainment and finance and retail.

As China is moving rapidly towards innovation and uniqueness, the industrial employment is expected to move from labour-intensive and low value production to more higher value, such as those used in manufacturing AI-enabled tools for both domestic market and export. Though the studies predict that the long-term consequence of AI on the job market is going to be optimistic for China, the transition phase towards an AI-based economy would cause some commotion to the existing labour markets because millions of workers would have to look for a change of career and maybe also locations. China has a grand Next Generation AI Plan, which aims hefty investments in the area of skill development. Having said that, this will also require some balancing by bringing in more refresher training and recruitment support for the displaced workers.

Therefore, any job which is at a “high risk” of going under automation does not necessarily mean that it’s going to be surely automated. This is because there are many financial, legal and other regulatory, and organizational roadblocks in the road to adopt AI and similar technologies. For China, it is estimated that though about 40% jobs could be considered for automation by 2037, only one-fourth of the current Chinese jobs will be displaced in reality around this period, as against 38% job creation.

International Fintech Investments go up to a Whopping US$57B in First Half of 2018

International fintech investments saw a sharp upward trend and set a record with US$57.9B worth of investments across 875 deals just within the first half of 2018. This was a drastic increase from the US$38.1B invested in the year 2017.

This year’s first half saw the successful closure of two gigantic deals: US$14B raised by Ant Financial in Q2’18, which was quite record-setting and second was Vantiv’s acquisition of WorldPay worth US$12.9B in Q1’18.

The volume of the deals was very robust and spiraled up from 834 in H2 in 2017 to 875 deals in H1 in 2018. In addition, worldwide median volume of late-stage venture financings shot up to US$25M during H1in 2018, which was up from the US$14M annual median size recorded in 2017. Early-stage deal size also went up; it was earlier at a median of US$5M in the year 2017 and went up to US$9.2M at the mid of this year.

“Large deals at all stages powered fintech investment in the first half of 2018,” said Ian Pollari, Global Co-Lead, KPMG Fintech. “But just as notable is the breadth of investment.  We’re seeing a mix of fintech sub-sectors drawing increasing interest, including data, AI and regtech  — these horizontal capabilities have appeal across the full spectrum of the financial services industry.”

“Not only is more investment flowing into emerging technologies like AI and subsectors like regtech, we are also seeing efforts to combine fintech capabilities and embed them within broader digital transformation programs,” added Anton Ruddenklau, Global Co-Lead, KPMG Fintech.

All venture capitalists were positive about the start-ups in the space of funding fintech, but M&A activity also seems to be mounting as more and more established fintechs seek exits. The M&A activity currently has matched the most active M&A periods observed till date.

The highlights of H1 2018

  • International fintech investment (PE, VC and M&A) has gone up to more than double. It stood at US$22B in the H2 of 2017 and it shot up to a record high of US$57.9B in H1 of 2018, pushed by nine US$1B+ mega deals.
  • The top four fintech deals of Europe were worth US$22.4B in investment and included the UK-based Vantiv’s acquisition of WorldPay, which was worth US$12.9B
  • In H1 2018, the investment in fintech companies only in Asia stood at US$16.8B with 162 deals, which was a raise from 119 deals in H2 2017.
  • Fintech VC size has stayed at steady levels since beginning of 2015, going up to 653 deals in H1 2018.
  • Median late-stage VC deal amount in the fintech sector drastically went up from US$14M in 2017 to US$25M in H1 2018.

US-based fintechs observed rise up in VC funding, crossing US$5B in H1 2018

In H1 2018, US fintech businesses pulled in US$14.2B worth of investments, which included over US$5B in VC investment. VC deal size kept increasing and went up from 276 deals in H2 2017 to about 328 deals in H1 2018, motivated to a large extent by the resurgent angel, seed and early-stage VC deals. Investors quickly invested in start-ups in rising fintech sub-segments, which included investment banking and regtech, and continuously poured in finances in mature, late-stage businesses such as Robinhood – whose US$363M was one of the biggest VC deals in H1 2018.

Biggest four deals in Europe were worth US$22.B

Total investment into fintech businesses in Europe touched US$26B with 198 deals in H1 2018, which was pushed by significant deals by WorldPay, iZettle, Nets, and IRIS software – which alone accounted for US$22.4B of this total. Though the deal value reached a new record high in Europe, the deal volumes came down from 268 in H2 2017 to 198 in H1 this year.

The UK was at the top in fintech investments in Europe with US$16.1B having charted about half of the top 10 deals in this region, though there were concerns regarding Brexit negotiations. Scandinavia’s fintech sector also did well, with the buyouts of iZettle (Sweden), Nets (Denmark) and Nordax Group (Sweden) figuring amongst the top ten deals in H1 of 2018.

The fintech sector of Asia touched US$16.8B because of Ant Financial deal

H2 2017 saw USS$2B which propelled the total fintech investments in Asia to a figure of US$16.8B with 162 deals in H1 2018 pushed by a huge US$14B Series C VC investments by Ant Financial. If we do not count this huge deal, Asia still recorded robust fintech investments in India, Australia, and Singapore which saw a quarter-over-quarter growth in overall fintech sector funding.

Following the footsteps of the worldwide trend, the median fintech VC late-stage deal size in Asia went up drastically in H1 of 2018 – shooting up from US$25M to US$37.7M, making it the highest seen in any region. AI and blockchain remained the main priorities for fintech investors in Asia, along with insurtech and regtech.

The payments and regtech sub-sectors came to the limelight

Payments saw a number of large exits in H1 2018 and emerged as one of the most established sub-sectors of fintech. This included successful IPOs by EVO Payments and GreenSky, Vantiv’s acquisition of WorldPay in the UK and Paypal’s acquisition of iZettle which was worth US$2.2B. Even the regtech sector saw a great start in the first half of this year with US$1.37B investments which have already left the 2017 total behind.

Blockchain has gone past the experimentation stage

Blockchain has been drawing in huge attention from global investors in the first half of this year with funding coming in for experienced companies and consortia planning to get added rounds rather than going to new market entrants. Huge rounds in blockchain companies were observed in H1 2018, which included US$77M to Ledger in France, US$100M+ rounds to R3 and Circle Internet Finance in the US.

Strong stance expected for fintech investments

With a huge chunk of capital still to be deployed, the fintech centers globally growing, more and more companies want to utilize fintech so as to drive further innovations, investments in fintech are surely predicted to stay robust by H2 of 2018.

Bahrain has approved a draft bill for VAT implementation on the New Year’s day in 2019 and announces the draft VAT law in Arabic

Some special meetings were organized both in the Bahrain National Assembly’s lower and upper houses on Sunday and Monday, and its Council of Ministers and also the Shura Council have given a go-ahead to the draft bills for the unified GCC VAT Agreement and also the draft VAT law. The law which establishes the Bahrain tax authority, the National Agency for Gulf Taxes, is also now approved. The draft VAT law has already been printed in the Arabic language.

It has been decided that VAT would be imposed in Bahrain at 5%, which is the standard rate and is as per the unified GCC VAT Agreement, which is going to be effective from 1 January 2019, and will place Bahrain at the third spot in GCC country’s after UAE and KSA, to have implemented VAT. As per the draft VAT law, the VAT regulations are going to be printed within 15 days of the effective date of the law (i.e. by 15 January 2019) and would list down the detailed applications of this law.

The Main Features of Bahrain’s New VAT system

Under the draft VAT law, the most important features of the VAT regime in Bahrain are as follows:

VAT Registration – In Bahrain, the compulsory and voluntary registration thresholds depend on the unified GCC VAT Agreement. Organizations that fully make zero-rated supplies could be exempted from the need to register. Every company or individual who is involved in an economic activity inside Bahrain would need to calculate their forecasted yearly revenue beginning from 1 January 2019 to find out if they have to register or not.  The registration schedule is going to be based on the value of taxable supplies where the larger taxpayers would have to register first.  The detailed schedule or timetable would be shortly announced.

Zero rated supplies  Bahrain is following UAE’s footsteps where a big list of supplies will be zero rated.  The export of various goods and services, global transportation of goods and also passengers, the supply of investment-grade valuable metals, the supply of some specific medicine and health equipment had to be necessarily zero rated as per the unified GCC VAT Agreement. Besides this, Bahrain would also zero rate preventive healthcare services, the supply of some precious stones like pearls, construction of latest buildings, educational services, and local transportation services.  Unlike the UAE and KSA, Bahrain also plans to zero rate about 94 food items as per the unified GCC VAT Agreement.

Exempt some supplies – Just as the UAE and KSA, Bahrain would also exempt the supply of margin-based fiscal or financial services and the supply of bare land.

Government supplies   The government supplies will also be taxable only until they are in its capacity as a public authority.

VAT Group   Bahrain plans to allow all the businesses or companies in the same group to get registered as a tax group thus allowing a single company to file a VAT return for the complete group.

VAT Returns – The VAT returns need to be filed and submitted within a month after the end of a tax period, which will be at least one month.

Books and Records – All the books and records have to be maintained for at least a three-year period.

  

What are Bahrain businesses required to do?

Businesses in Bahrain would need at least three to six months to be prepared for VAT. But there is lesser time remaining for the VAT implementation in Bahrain, companies must ideally begin preparing for VAT as soon as possible. The most important areas that the businesses need to concentrate on to implement VAT within their business are as follows:

  1. Create a Project Plan: Develop a detailed budget for the VAT implementation (for example, consultants required, training, resources, IT systems needed), form a VAT steering committee and then allocate various responsibilities

  2. Spread Awareness: Educate and train one’s staff on the impact VAT would have on accounting and reporting processes

  3. Assessment of the VAT Impact: Take the VAT impact assessment and review the transitional provisions and categorize and map the VAT treatment of all business transactions

  4. Evaluate Cash Flow: Gauge the impact on cash flow and accordingly estimate the working capital requirements

  5. IT Systems: Review the capability of the existing accounting systems for VAT reporting and then think of upgrading or getting a new system

  6. Pricing: Review the impact of VAT on factors such as demand and pricing

  7. Contracts: Assess the existing contracts with various suppliers and customers and then include the VAT clauses in the new contracts

  8. Processes: Decide on the amendments needed to the existing AP (accounts payable) processes and documentation like invoices and record-keeping

  9. Customer and Supplier Management: Discuss with the existing suppliers and clients to inform them about the impact of the VAT and enter a negotiation with the new suppliers and customers

  10. Compliance: Decide if it’s required and then accordingly register for VAT on time

We at IMC, have strong expertise and experience of VAT implementation and have been doing it in the UAE and the KSA. We can help you in assessing how VAT would impact your business and accordingly guide you with the VAT requirements in Bahrain.

SEBI’s New KYC Norms for Foreign Portfolio Investors

SEBI is the market regulator in India and it has revised Know Your Client (KYC) norms for Foreign Portfolio Investors (FPIs) stating that residents, as well as non-residents, can now hold a non-controlling stake in such entities. SEBI has recently issued revised two circulars pertaining to the KYC requirements and their eligibility conditions for Foreign Portfolio Investors.

These circulars were issued by the SEBI after a panel suggested certain changes to the FPI guidelines that were proposed earlier. The changes have been brought after understanding the concerns of a certain market segment regarding the difficulties that overseas funds might face while ensuring compliance.

With the new KYC norms in place, NRIs, OCIs (Overseas Citizens of India) and RIs (Resident Indians) are now been permitted to hold a non-controlling stake in FPIs. According to the regulator, there would not be any restrictions on NRIs, OCIs, and RIs to manage non-investing FPIs SEBI-registered offshore funds as well as registered investment managers.

On fulfillment of certain conditions, these entities are eligible to be constituents of FPIs. If the assets under the management in the FPI are held by NRI/OCI/RI either singly below 25 percent or in the aggregate form below 50 percent, then such entities would be allowed to be constituents of the FPI. An NRI, OCI or RI can directly or indirectly own a non-investing FPI.

SEBI has further noted that NRI, OCI or RI shall be free from the restriction that they should not be in control of FPIs that are offshore funds and for which no objection certificate has been issued by the board as per the terms of mutual fund regulations.

For compliance, the existing FPIs and new applicants shall be given a time period of two years from the date of new rules coming into force or the date of registration, whichever is later. However, if there is any temporary breach, a time period of 90 days shall be given to ensure compliance.

SEBI further said that a list of beneficial owners must be maintained and provided by the FPIs under category II and III. Beneficial owners are the person who controls or owns an FPI. They are divided into three classes on the basis of their risk profile. The FPIs belonging to high-risk jurisdictions may apply for a lower threshold of 10 percent for identifying beneficial owners and ensure KYC documentation that is applicable to category III entities. SEBI further said that a beneficial owner must not be a nominee of another person.

SEBI further clarified that senior manager officials are the ones who hold a senior management position and take key decisions relating to FPIs must be identified and disclose their personal information.

SEBI stated that where the companies and trust provide services of lawyers, accountants, etc. to FPI must provide the information such as real owners of such service providing entities.

The new rules shall be applicable to the investors of the P-Notes or Participatory Notes. The KYC documentation in relation to category III FPIs shall require an annual audited financial statement or a net worth certificate from the auditor. However, such documents are exempted during investigations or an enquiry.

In relation to the exempted documents, FPIs must submit an undertaking that the relevant documents would be submitted to the designated depository participants or custodians upon demand by regulators or law enforcement agencies.

The custodians should preserve and maintain the records of concerned FPIs for at least five years from the date of cessation of the transaction. In addition, if there a litigation going on, such records must be maintained until the completion of the proceedings.

The regulator shall give FPIs a period of 180 days to comply with new rules. On failure to comply, a further 180 days shall be given to close down their existing positions.

FPIs under category II and III registered prior to the current circular must disclose the list of beneficial owners and other KYC documents applicable.

Former RBI Deputy Governor H R Khan and public comments on the draft proposals headed the panel to prepare the final guidelines.

A Quick Guide on the Mandatory Reporting Requirements of U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA) for Foreign Investment in U.S.

The U.S. Department of Commerce has an agency called U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA) that tracks the international commerce and publishes leading indicators of the economy like GDP. The economic statistics prepared by BEA help in gauging the performance of the U.S. economy and the role of the U.S. in the global economy. In relation to this, the agency collects the data of inbound and outbound U.S. investments. In order to collect the data, the BEA conducts 7 mandatory surveys on a quarterly, annually or five-yearly period.

 

Who Must Report?

For the mandatory reporting obligations, BEA collects data from;

  • Any person or business of U.S. origin holding a 10% or greater interest in a foreign business.
  • Any person or business of foreign origin holding a 10% or greater interest in a U.S. business.
  • U.S. subsidiaries of foreign businesses.
  • Foreign subsidiaries of U.S. businesses.
  • U.S. or foreign-owned businesses that have transactions with the U.S. service sector.

Cross-border investment whether it is direct or indirect with ownership interests requires reporting under BEA obligations. Any failure to comply with any of the BEA norms attracts both civil and criminal penalties.

The BEA has made is mandatory for all foreign people who are making investments in the U.S. to give transactional reporting. The reporting has to be made within 45 days of acquisitions, expansions and business formation.

Reporting Obligations and Timeframe

  • If the company makes a U.S. direct investment abroad then the compliance includes quarterly, annual and quinquennial i.e. 5 years reporting obligations.
  • If the company makes a foreign direct investment in the US then the compliance includes quarterly, annual, quinquennial i.e. 5 years and transactional reporting obligations.

 

Reporting Obligations for Non-U.S. Person or Business Owing Business in the U.S. 

The reporting obligation for a non US person or business owning a business in the U.S. can be divided into four parts; Transactional Survey, Quarterly Survey, Annual Survey and 5 Year Benchmark Survey.

  • Transactional Survey

Transactional survey of the foreign direct investment in the U.S. is compulsory for every acquisition, formation and expansion of U.S. business. It must be filed within 45 days of the transaction. However, there is an exemption for filing if the transaction is below the threshold limit of $3 million.

  • Quarterly Survey

Quarterly survey of the foreign direct investment in the U.S. is mandatory for every foreign person owning 10% or more of a U.S. business enterprise. The reporting must be done upon request from BEA, 30 days after each quarter or 45 days after year-end.

  • Annual Survey

Annual survey of the foreign direct investment in the U.S. is mandatory for every foreign person owning 10% or more of a U.S. business enterprise. The reporting must be done upon request from BEA or 150 days after year-end.

  • 5 Year Benchmark Survey

5 year benchmark survey of the foreign direct investment in the U.S. is required of all parties where a foreign person owns 10% or more of a U.S. business enterprise. The reporting has to be done within 150 days after year-end.

Reporting Obligations for a U.S. Person or Businesses having Ownership Interest in a Foreign Business 

The reporting obligation for a US person or business owning a business in the U.S. can be divided into three parts; Quarterly Survey, Annual Survey and 5 Year Benchmark Survey.

  • Quarterly Survey

Quarterly survey of the U.S. direct investment in abroad is for U.S. persons who owns 10% or more of a foreign business enterprise. The reports must be filed upon request from BEA or 30 days after each quarter or 45 days after year-end.

  • Annual Survey

Quarterly survey of the U.S. direct investment in abroad is for U.S. persons who owns 10% or more of a foreign business enterprise. The reports must be filed upon request from BEA or 150 days after year-end.

  • 5 Year Benchmark Survey

5 Year Benchmark Survey of the U.S. direct investment in abroad is for U.S. persons who owns 10% or more of a foreign business enterprise. It is the most comprehensive survey required by all the parties. The parties must file report within 150 days after the year-end.

Reporting Obligations for a U.S. Service Sector Business Transacting with Non-U.S. Parties

Reporting obligations for a U.S. service sector business are compulsory regardless of the fact that the ownership belongs to the U.S. or foreign ownership. The BEA services surveys track the foreign trade in services by U.S. companies. The BEA surveys apply to U.S. service sector companies regardless of the ownership.

The BEA surveys can be divided into three parts; quarterly survey, annual survey and benchmark survey.

  • Quarterly Surveys

Quarterly surveys are for financial services, insurance services, U.S. ocean carriers, U.S. and foreign airline operators, selected services and intellectual property.

  • Annual Surveys

Annual surveys are for foreign ocean carriers.

  • Benchmark Surveys

Benchmark surveys are for financial services, intellectual property trade, insurance service and services like consulting, advertising, etc.

Bureau of Economic Analysis Compliance for Sample Organization Structures, Parent/ Subsidiary Relationships and Business Ownership Interests

  • A U.S. business ownership abroad requires BEA reporting if it holds 10% or more ownership stake in such company. For example, U.S. Company holding 10% or more stake in a South African company requires BEA reporting.

A Foreign company having 10% or more stake in a U.S. business requires BEA reporting. For example, the South African company holding a 10% stake in a U.S. company is eligible for BEA reporting.

 

Reporting Obligations for Indirect Cross-Border Investment and Business Ownership

Any U.S. business that holds indirect business interest due to cross-border investment or business ownership requires BEA reporting.

 

About us

IMC Group is one of the leading firms that provide global compliance services. With our consulting services, we ensure that our clients from varied industry sectors comply with the complex BEA requirements in full and in a timely manner. Our experienced and expert team fulfils the burdensome mandatory reporting obligations of BEA in a smooth and simplified manner so that you can focus on running your business without any stress.

We guide you in implementing the best practices for collecting and retaining data, reporting processes and procedures as well as guide you on the response practices.

  Our BEA Compliance Services

Few of our services include;

  • BEA compliance assessment.
  • Identifying when the business requires BEA reporting obligation.
  • Effective and efficient maintenance of routine procedures, monitoring, collection of data, etc. to the BEA.
  • Analysing complex BEA data requests and keeping a track of them.
  • Gathering, retaining and reporting information in the prescribed manner.
  • Completion and filing of BEA report.

To utilise our services you can reach us via email or phone.

NRI Offshore Fund Managers Request to SEBI for Some Relief

Non-resident Indian (NRI) offshore fund managers seek Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) to permit them to own a minimum of 5 percent in their fund.

There was an announcement on April 10, in which the market regulator said that the NRIs are not allowed to invest as foreign portfolio investors (FPIs).

It was also said that FPIs that were supported by NRIs discussed this with the SEBI officials on Thursday. The regulator will be finalizing and taking a decision on this matter within the coming week.

This decision is important as many India-dedicated funds are presently functioning while violating the circular from SEBI. If a solution to this issue is not found by December, they would be obligated to wrap up these funds.

The estimates and statistics suggest that about one-third of the total FPI assets are managed by Indian companies or are promoted by NRIs or PIOs (person of Indian origin).

However, as per the guidelines by SEBI, an NRI or PIO cannot be a “beneficial owner” of a foreign fund. He or she is not entitled to invest as an FPI.

Getting seed capital for the fund is a common practice when we start any pooled fund. This process is termed as ‘skin in the game’ and helps to build confidence. In fact, doing this is a statutory obligation in many countries for starting a fund.

For example, in Singapore, the founding members or the fund managers have to necessarily invest a mandatory seed capital of about $240,000 or more while starting the fund.

The main reasons for SEBI taking a tough stance regarding NRI investments coming through FPIs are the concerns regarding money laundering and regulatory arbitrage.

The FPI guidelines were framed so as to pull in additional foreign investments into the country. Therefore, these funds are granted with various incentives, which include a simple and easy process for registration, flexibility in case of taxation and also in compliance. Indian officials have a doubt that permitting NRIs to make investments via the FPI route could end up in round-tripping. Also, there could be loose ends in the form of opportunities for arbitrage as it would support domestic money to be channelled via the FPI route to shun taxes.

Oman is Planning a Mandatory Health Insurance from January

The Council of Ministers of Oman has decided to execute a national insurance policy in 2017

Oman is ready to make it obligatory for organizations and businesses to provide health insurance to their staff beginning from January.

Waleed Al Zadjali, the head of Oman Medical Association said while confirming this news:

Oman’s Capital Market officials said that they were dealing with the relevant institutions regarding the strategy and the future plans were still in the “drafting stage” after the Council of Ministers took a decision last year.

Nasr Al Salhi, who is the authority’s director of valuation and risks surveillance department said that the work was still “in progress” and the first step was to link the insurance companies with various hospitals and develop an electronic system which could take care of medicines and treatments, thus outing a check on manipulating practices like price increases etc.

The execution will be done in phases like in the neighbouring United Arab Emirates.

Oman’s Chamber of Commerce and Industry had earlier said that a fair health insurance cover should ideally be given to all the private sector employees by 2018.

But there are some companies which have got affected by difficult market conditions and the strict government measures and do not give importance to providing insurance to employees.

Dubai’s health insurance law has made it compulsory for the employers and sponsors in various brackets to provide coverage in a phased manner starting from 2014 to March 31, 2017.

The execution of that structure enhanced the profits made by the UAE’s health insurers in the year of 2016 in spite of difficult market environment linked to the lower oil price.

Saudi’s Council of Cooperative Health Insurance has also started with the concluding phase of a unified health insurance structure in April 2017.

Singapore and Japan Signed the dotted Line and Agree to Strengthen the Support Given to Start-ups and other Businesses

The Japanese and Singapore start-ups and other enterprises are now looking forward to new initiatives, actions and exchanges of important information under the recent agreement they have got into.

Singapore and Japan got into a new partnership recently on August 29, 2018 which is meant to bolster the support that all the start-ups and other entrepreneurs and enterprises get from both the countries.

The memorandum of understanding (MOU) was signed by two parties – Singapore’s Economic Development Board (EDB) and Enterprise Singapore, and the Japan External Trade Organisation (JETRO).

The agreement was signed on the occasion of the 50th ASEAN Economic Ministers’ Meeting at the Shangri-La Hotel. This MOU aimed to reinforce the ties between Japan and Singapore so that their innovation ecosystems could collaborate. This will enable the three agencies to make the access easier and generate more opportunities by taking new initiatives, organizing events and exchanging information for all start-ups and other businesses.

Through this MOU, Japan has been included in the Singapore’s Global Innovation Alliance (GIA) initiative.

A major proposal in the Committee on the Future Economy report, the GIA was launched last year with a goal to fortify Singapore’s association with all the foremost innovation hubs and important markets globally.

This partnership is also touted to provide precious access and new opportunities for both Singapore and Japanese businesses so that they can collaborate, get into fresh partnerships and also co-create best-in-class solutions. Therefore, company formation in Singapore will be even easier and beneficial.

As a result, this will augment the ecosystems affecting start-ups and innovations in both happening in both these countries.

Follow Us

Recent Posts